Re: [HACKERS] libpq with ssl vs psql without

2008-11-11 Thread Magnus Hagander
Tom Lane wrote: > Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I just noticed that if you have libpq with SSL support, but psql >> without, we don't print any SSL information at all. Would it be >> worthwhile to have it print that SSL is in use, even if we can't print >> the details about the con

Re: [HACKERS] libpq with ssl vs psql without

2008-11-11 Thread Tom Lane
Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I just noticed that if you have libpq with SSL support, but psql > without, we don't print any SSL information at all. Would it be > worthwhile to have it print that SSL is in use, even if we can't print > the details about the connection? I think the

[HACKERS] libpq with ssl vs psql without

2008-11-11 Thread Magnus Hagander
I just noticed that if you have libpq with SSL support, but psql without, we don't print any SSL information at all. Would it be worthwhile to have it print that SSL is in use, even if we can't print the details about the connection? It's not something that's very common outside development scenar