Greg Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For instance, here
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2004-03/msg00696.php are some
profiles documenting a case where nearly 40% of the runtime goes into
lappend's in 7.4. I haven't had time to repeat the test
Jeff wrote:
Do we have any numbers as to how much this will help things?
No, I haven't done any benchmarking yet (I might do some before I
leave for the summer, but it's not a priority...)
FWIW, the performance improvement from this patch won't be as large
as it might be, since Tom already
On May 26, 2004, at 12:47 AM, Neil Conway wrote:
I've applied the list rewrite patch to CVS HEAD. I've also sent a copy
of the patch I applied to the -patches list.
Nifty.
Do we have any numbers as to how much this will help things?
If not, would something like a pg_bench exercise the new code
I've applied the list rewrite patch to CVS HEAD. I've also sent a
copy of the patch I applied to the -patches list.
Notes:
- the tree compiles without warnings and passes the regression
tests. I'm not aware of any bugs, regression failures, or compiler
warnings caused by the list rewrite patch
- anything else?
All compiles and passes regression tests on FreeBSD...
Chris
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message
