[moved to hackers]
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Why do we have log_min_error_statement default to PANIC level? Wouldn't
ERROR be a better default?
Panic basically means off, meaning we don't print queries that generate
errors. Should we print them by default?
I would. S
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> >Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >
> >
>
>
> wow. that was nearly 3 months ago ...
Oh, I remember why I kept this email now. I am going to try to code
this.
> Subsequent discussion suggested we should add "syntax-errors" to the
> allowed values (and
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
wow. that was nearly 3 months ago ...
I wrote:
If nobody is working on this I am prepared to look at it:
. Allow logging of only data definition(DDL), or DDL and modification
statements
Here are some options:
1. change the type of
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> I wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > If nobody is working on this I am prepared to look at it:
> >
> > . Allow logging of only data definition(DDL), or DDL and modification
> > statements
> >
>
>
>
> Here are some options:
>
> 1. change the type of "log_statement" option from boolea
I wrote:
If nobody is working on this I am prepared to look at it:
. Allow logging of only data definition(DDL), or DDL and modification
statements
Here are some options:
1. change the type of "log_statement" option from boolean to string,
with allowed values of "all, mod, ddl, none" with
