Re: [HACKERS] logical changeset generation v3 - Source for Slony

2012-11-20 Thread Andres Freund
Hi, On 2012-11-19 19:50:32 -0500, Steve Singer wrote: On 12-11-18 11:07 AM, Andres Freund wrote: I think we should provide some glue code to do this, otherwise people will start replicating all the bugs I hacked into this... More seriously: I think we should have support code here, no user

Re: [HACKERS] logical changeset generation v3 - Source for Slony

2012-11-19 Thread Steve Singer
First, you can add me to the list of people saying 'wow', I'm impressed. The approach I am taking to reviewing this to try and answer the following question 1) How might a future version of slony be able to use logical replication as described by your patch and design documents and what

Re: [HACKERS] logical changeset generation v3 - Source for Slony

2012-11-19 Thread Andres Freund
Hi Steve! On 2012-11-17 22:50:35 -0500, Steve Singer wrote: First, you can add me to the list of people saying 'wow', I'm impressed. Thanks! The approach I am taking to reviewing this to try and answer the following question 1) How might a future version of slony be able to use logical

Re: [HACKERS] logical changeset generation v3 - Source for Slony

2012-11-19 Thread Steve Singer
On 12-11-18 11:07 AM, Andres Freund wrote: Hi Steve! I think we should provide some glue code to do this, otherwise people will start replicating all the bugs I hacked into this... More seriously: I think we should have support code here, no user will want to learn the intracacies of feedback