Hi,
On 2013-09-03 11:40:57 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Andres Freund
> wrote:
> > 0005 wal_decoding: Log xl_running_xact's at a higher frequency than
> > checkpoints are done
> > * benefits hot standby startup
I tried to update the patch to address the comment
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>> I don't think it particularly needs to be configurable, but I wonder
>> if we can't be a bit smarter about when we do it. For example,
>> suppose we logged it every 15 s but only until we log a non-overflowed
>> snapshot.
>
> There's actuall
On 2013-09-04 10:02:05 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> >> I don't think it particularly needs to be configurable, but I wonder
> >> if we can't be a bit smarter about when we do it. For example,
> >> suppose we logged it every 15 s but only until
On 2013-09-03 15:56:15 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> >> And why is every 15 seconds good enough?
> >
> > Waiting 15s to become consistent instead of checkpoint_timeout seems to
> > be ok to me and to be a good tradeoff between overhead and wait
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>> To my way of thinking, it seems as though we ought to always begin
>> replay at a checkpoint, so the standby ought always to see one of
>> these records immediately. Obviously that's not good enough, but why
>> not?
>
> We always see one af
On 2013-09-03 12:22:22 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> >> 1. I think more comments are needed here to explain why we need this.
> >> I don't know if the comments should go into the functions modified by
> >> this patch or in some other location,
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>> 1. I think more comments are needed here to explain why we need this.
>> I don't know if the comments should go into the functions modified by
>> this patch or in some other location, but I don't find what's here now
>> adequate for understa
On 2013-09-03 11:40:57 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Andres Freund
> wrote:
> > 0005 wal_decoding: Log xl_running_xact's at a higher frequency than
> > checkpoints are done
> > * benefits hot standby startup
>
> Review:
>
> 1. I think more comments are needed he
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> 0005 wal_decoding: Log xl_running_xact's at a higher frequency than
> checkpoints are done
> * benefits hot standby startup
Review:
1. I think more comments are needed here to explain why we need this.
I don't know if the comments should
Hi,
I've attached a couple of the preliminary patches to $subject which I've
recently cleaned up in the hope that we can continue improving on those
in a piecemal fashion.
I am preparing submission of a newer version of the major patch but
unfortunately progress on that is slower than I'd like...
Hi!
I am rather pleased to announce the next version of the changeset
extraction patchset. Thanks to help from a large number of people I
think we are slowly getting to the point where it is getting
committable.
Since the last submitted version
(20121115002746.ga7...@awork2.anarazel.de) a large n
11 matches
Mail list logo
