--On Montag, November 26, 2007 21:41:33 +0100 I wrote:
--On Montag, November 26, 2007 13:02:14 -0500 Tom Lane
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bernd Helmle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
... But isn't it worth to special case the
code in grow_memtuples() (and maybe other places where sort is likely to
--On Montag, November 26, 2007 13:02:14 -0500 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Bernd Helmle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
... But isn't it worth to special case the
code in grow_memtuples() (and maybe other places where sort is likely to
use more RAM), so that we can remove this constraint on
Bernd Helmle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ... But isn't it worth to special case the
> code in grow_memtuples() (and maybe other places where sort is likely to
> use more RAM), so that we can remove this constraint on 64-Bit systems with
> many RAM built in? Or am I missing something very impor
While supporting a customer to increase recovery performance from its
backups i just realized that PostgreSQL never uses big maintenance_work_mem
settings. Even giving 10GB of RAM to maintenance_work_mem results in using
a fraction of memory (it switches to external sort after using around 2
GB