On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 09:49:05AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just figured that if we let LockRelation use GetCurrentTransactionId()
then the wrong thing happens if we let large objects survive
subtransaction commit/abort.
So I have changed it to
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 09:49:05AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
No, at least not if you made that a global change. Doing it that way
will mean that a failed subtransaction will not release its locks, no?
Hmm ... won't they be released when the ResourceOwner
Hackers,
I just figured that if we let LockRelation use GetCurrentTransactionId()
then the wrong thing happens if we let large objects survive
subtransaction commit/abort. The problem is that when closing a large
object at main transaction commit, which was opened inside a
subtransaction, the
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just figured that if we let LockRelation use GetCurrentTransactionId()
then the wrong thing happens if we let large objects survive
subtransaction commit/abort.
So I have changed it to use GetTopTransactionId() instead. Is that OK
with everybody?
