Robert Haas wrote:
- MERGE
- checkpoint improvements
As far as these two go, the state of MERGE is still rougher than I would
like. The code itself isn't too hard to read, and that the errors that
are popping up tend to be caught by assertions (rather than just being
mysterious crashes)
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
- extensions - may need 2 or more commits
I'm now basically done with coding, I'm writing the docs for the upgrade
patch and preparing the upgrade SQL files for pre-9.1 to 9.1 upgrades of
the contrib modules.
Doing that, I've been cleaning up or
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 06:32, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
We're coming the end of the 9.1 development cycle, and I think that
there is a serious danger of insufficient bandwidth to handle the
large patches we have outstanding. For my part, I am hoping to find
the bandwidth to
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 4:29 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
As for priority between those that *were* submitted earlier, and have
been reworked (which is how the system is supposed to work), it's a
lot harder. And TBH, I think we're going to have a problem getting all
those
(2011/01/02 14:32), Robert Haas wrote:
We're coming the end of the 9.1 development cycle, and I think that
there is a serious danger of insufficient bandwidth to handle the
large patches we have outstanding. For my part, I am hoping to find
the bandwidth to two, MAYBE three major commits
Robert Haas wrote:
- true serializability - not entirely sure of the status of this
I try to keep the status section of the Wiki page up-to-date. I have
just reviewed it and tweaked it for the latest events:
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Serializable#Current_Status
There are a number
We're coming the end of the 9.1 development cycle, and I think that
there is a serious danger of insufficient bandwidth to handle the
large patches we have outstanding. For my part, I am hoping to find
the bandwidth to two, MAYBE three major commits between now and the
end of 9.1CF4, but I am not
