Re: [HACKERS] min_recovery_apply_delay

2014-05-10 Thread Tom Lane
=?UTF-8?Q?Fabr=C3=ADzio_de_Royes_Mello?= writes: > On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello >> wrote: Wouldn't a better name be recovery_min_apply_delay? >>> +1 >> Works for me. > Done!! Since there were no objectio

Re: [HACKERS] min_recovery_apply_delay

2014-05-10 Thread Fabrízio de Royes Mello
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > > On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello > wrote: > >> Wouldn't a better name be recovery_min_apply_delay? > > > > +1 > > Works for me. > Done!! -- Fabrízio de Royes Mello Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL >> Timbira: http://

Re: [HACKERS] min_recovery_apply_delay

2014-05-10 Thread Robert Haas
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote: >> Wouldn't a better name be recovery_min_apply_delay? > > +1 Works for me. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgre

Re: [HACKERS] min_recovery_apply_delay

2014-05-09 Thread Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Em sexta-feira, 9 de maio de 2014, Peter Eisentraut escreveu: > Wouldn't a better name be recovery_min_apply_delay? > > +1 The original name was recovery_apply_delay but in some point of review it was changed to reflect better the limit. > Other parameters are usually named something_min_somet

[HACKERS] min_recovery_apply_delay

2014-05-09 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Wouldn't a better name be recovery_min_apply_delay? Other parameters are usually named something_min_something. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers