Re: [HACKERS] missing COMMENT ON objects

Added. --- Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > > >> Unimplemented feature AFAIR. BTW, if you feel like doing something > >> about this, COMMENT ON LARGE OBJECT would be good too. > > > > > > * COMMENT ON [ CAST | CONVERSIO

Re: [HACKERS] missing COMMENT ON objects

Unimplemented feature AFAIR. BTW, if you feel like doing something about this, COMMENT ON LARGE OBJECT would be good too. * COMMENT ON [ CAST | CONVERSION | OPERATOR CLASS | LARGE OBJECT ] Bruce - want to make this a TODO? May as well assign it to me - I'll have a play with it. I assume th

Re: [HACKERS] missing COMMENT ON objects

Added, yes, a 7.5 item. --- Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > >>I notice you cannot COMMENT ON the following: > >>* Cast > >>* Conversion > >>* Operator class > >>Is that a deliberate omission, or is it an oversight? > > > >

Re: [HACKERS] missing COMMENT ON objects

I notice you cannot COMMENT ON the following: * Cast * Conversion * Operator class Is that a deliberate omission, or is it an oversight? Unimplemented feature AFAIR. BTW, if you feel like doing something about this, COMMENT ON LARGE OBJECT would be good too. * COMMENT ON [ CAST | CONVERSION | O

Re: [HACKERS] missing COMMENT ON objects

Christopher Kings-Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I notice you cannot COMMENT ON the following: > * Cast > * Conversion > * Operator class > Is that a deliberate omission, or is it an oversight? Unimplemented feature AFAIR. BTW, if you feel like doing something about this, COMMENT ON LARGE OB

[HACKERS] missing COMMENT ON objects

Hi, I notice you cannot COMMENT ON the following: * Cast * Conversion * Operator class Docs: http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/sql-comment.html Is that a deliberate omission, or is it an oversight? If it's deliberate, it seems kind of arbitrary. Or have the docs just not been upda