Josh Berkus wrote:
It's very nice to throw these things out there and put them on the TODO
list ... and if I had $100,000 in development money to throw at something, I
might spend it that way ... but to propose them as *immediate* solutions to
problems for 8.2 is fantasy.
Point taken. Obviou
Lukas, all:
> So what I am suggesting is that PostgreSQL.org should push people
> towards the monolithic distro. The docs should contain everything that
> is in the monolithic distro. At conference we should say the name of the
> monolithic distro etc.
The issue I think you're ignoring is that ma
Since I appreantly like monologs .. MySQL also has other features that
are not available via pgfoundery like being able to determine the
default charset on the database, table and column level, as well as
COLLATE support to determine the sort order at runtime.
SHOW ALL; ?
Anyways what I
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
The topic here is NOT what features are missing from postgres.
Of course it is ;-)
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
Lukas Smith wrote:
Since I appreantly like monologs .. MySQL also has other features that
are not available via pgfoundery like being able to determine the
default charset on the database, table and column level, as well as
COLLATE support to determine the sort order at runtime.
Anyways wha
Lukas Smith wrote:
Lukas Smith wrote:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
whereas PostgreSQL is continuously complaing that
MySQL is inferior yet way more popular. Maybe MySQL's popularity is not
even PostgreSQL's goal, but I am sure a bit more would be welcome.
Does MySQL have
Lukas Smith wrote:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
whereas PostgreSQL is continuously complaing that
MySQL is inferior yet way more popular. Maybe MySQL's popularity is not
even PostgreSQL's goal, but I am sure a bit more would be welcome.
Does MySQL have a monolithic distrib
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
whereas PostgreSQL is continuously complaing that
MySQL is inferior yet way more popular. Maybe MySQL's popularity is not
even PostgreSQL's goal, but I am sure a bit more would be welcome.
Does MySQL have a monolithic distribution?
Well obviou
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
whereas PostgreSQL is continuously complaing that
MySQL is inferior yet way more popular. Maybe MySQL's popularity is not
even PostgreSQL's goal, but I am sure a bit more would be welcome.
Does MySQL have a monolithic distr
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
> whereas PostgreSQL is continuously complaing that
> MySQL is inferior yet way more popular. Maybe MySQL's popularity is not
> even PostgreSQL's goal, but I am sure a bit more would be welcome.
Does MySQL have a monolithic distribution?
---(end
Yeah, but if PostgreSQL decides to endorse one monolithic distro in
the way I described it could give that project hopefully the necessary
lift. And the ultimate goal is obviously that some of those newbies
coming by way of the monolithic distro turn into people that bring
ressources to the P
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Yeah, but if PostgreSQL decides to endorse one monolithic distro in
the way I described it could give that project hopefully the necessary
lift. And the ultimate goal is obviously that some of those newbies
coming by way of the monolithic distro turn into people that br
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
But, that isn't our role ... that should be the role of whomever takes on
the role of 'maintainer' for such a monolithic distribution ... its no more
our role to decide that pl/Java is better or worse then pl/J ... our role
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
But, that isn't our role ... that should be the role of whomever takes
on the role of 'maintainer' for such a monolithic distribution ... its
no more our role to decide that pl/Java is better or worse then pl/J
... our role is to provide that core for everyone else to
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
But, that isn't our role ... that should be the role of whomever takes
on the role of 'maintainer' for such a monolithic distribution ... its
no more our role to decide that pl/Java is better or worse then pl/J ...
our role is to provide that core for everyone else to b
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, Lukas Smith wrote:
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Aside from obviously the big issue of who maintains all the pgfoundry
stuff, I also think that the PostgreSQL family would benefit from a
distribution that is more "and the kitchen sink" style. I do not know
exactly if Bizgres cou
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Aside from obviously the big issue of who maintains all the pgfoundry
stuff, I also think that the PostgreSQL family would benefit from a
distribution that is more "and the kitchen sink" style. I do not know
exactly if Bizgres could be considered just that? Or maybe it co
17 matches
Mail list logo
