Re: [HACKERS] multibyte regression tests

2005-07-30 Thread Bruce Momjian
This has been saved for the 8.2 release: http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold --- Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > Luke Lonergan wrote: > > >Andrew, > > > > > > > >>Good. So should we roll this up in

Re: [HACKERS] multibyte regression tests

2005-07-15 Thread Andrew Dunstan
I am totally confused by your response and Luke's. I think we might be talking completely at cross purposes. My original question had nothing to do with the COPY patch. cheers andrew Ayush Parashar wrote: Andrew, Luke, As pointed by Luke, the reason for using mb regression suite (src/tes

Re: [HACKERS] multibyte regression tests

2005-07-15 Thread Ayush Parashar
Andrew, Luke, As pointed by Luke, the reason for using mb regression suite (src/test/mb), is to consolidate all similar kinds of multi-byte/client encoding tests at one place. Thanks, Ayush On 7/15/05 1:36 PM, "Luke Lonergan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Andrew, > >> Good. So should we roll

Re: [HACKERS] multibyte regression tests

2005-07-15 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Luke Lonergan wrote: Andrew, Good. So should we roll this up into the standard regression suite? Why are these tests separate? Is it just that they need a UTF8 encoded db rather than an SQL-ASCII encoded db? I think that was the idea - the src/test/mb kit was already there and was

Re: [HACKERS] multibyte regression tests

2005-07-15 Thread Luke Lonergan
Andrew, > Good. So should we roll this up into the standard regression suite? Why > are these tests separate? Is it just that they need a UTF8 encoded db > rather than an SQL-ASCII encoded db? I think that was the idea - the src/test/mb kit was already there and was designed to create the UTF8 d

Re: [HACKERS] multibyte regression tests

2005-07-15 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Good. So should we roll this up into the standard regression suite? Why are these tests separate? Is it just that they need a UTF8 encoded db rather than an SQL-ASCII encoded db? cheers andrew Luke Lonergan wrote: They should be completely portable (provided the script in src/test/mb runs

Re: [HACKERS] multibyte regression tests

2005-07-14 Thread Luke Lonergan
They should be completely portable (provided the script in src/test/mb runs on that platform). - Luke On 7/12/05 10:54 AM, "Andrew Dunstan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Should we add the multibyte regression tests to the buildfarm test > suite? Does anyone know how portable they are? I guess

[HACKERS] multibyte regression tests

2005-07-12 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Should we add the multibyte regression tests to the buildfarm test suite? Does anyone know how portable they are? I guess adding them would be one way to find out. cheers andrew ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planne

Re: [HACKERS] Multibyte regression tests broken?

2001-09-21 Thread Tatsuo Ishii
> Do the multibyte regression tests in src/test/mb currently pass for > other people? I'm getting failures on most of them, and what it looks > like to me is that the latest commits of the "expected" files contain > wrong results. You are correct. Will fix. -- Tatsuo Ishii

Re: [HACKERS] Multibyte regression tests broken?

2001-09-21 Thread Karel Zak
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 09:55:56PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Do the multibyte regression tests in src/test/mb currently pass for > other people? I'm getting failures on most of them, and what it looks > like to me is that the latest commits of the "expected" files contain > wrong results. $ ./mbr

[HACKERS] Multibyte regression tests broken?

2001-09-20 Thread Tom Lane
Do the multibyte regression tests in src/test/mb currently pass for other people? I'm getting failures on most of them, and what it looks like to me is that the latest commits of the "expected" files contain wrong results. regards, tom lane ---(en