Re: [HACKERS] namespaces

2001-10-22 Thread Bill Studenmund
On Sun, 21 Oct 2001, Serguei Mokhov wrote: > - Original Message - > From: Bill Studenmund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 2:04 PM > > > > Quick question: would it be possible then create a 'system' package > > > and 'system' (or 'master' if you will) schema (when it's

Re: [HACKERS] namespaces

2001-10-22 Thread Serguei Mokhov
- Original Message - From: Bill Studenmund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 2:04 PM > > > It means that when you want to use one of the built in functions > > > (date_part, abs, floor, sqrt etc.) you don't have to prefix it with > > > "standard.". You can just say date_

Re: [HACKERS] namespaces

2001-10-20 Thread Bill Studenmund
On Sat, 20 Oct 2001, Serguei Mokhov wrote: > > It means that when you want to use one of the built in functions > > (date_part, abs, floor, sqrt etc.) you don't have to prefix it with > > "standard.". You can just say date_part(), abs(), floor(), sqrt(), etc. > > The only time you need to prefix

Re: [HACKERS] namespaces

2001-10-20 Thread Serguei Mokhov
- Original Message - From: Bill Studenmund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2001 8:22 AM > My description of namespaces seems to have caused a fair bit of confusion. > Let me try again. > > The ability of the package changes to automatically check standard when > you give a

Re: [HACKERS] namespaces, was Package support for Postgres

2001-10-19 Thread Bill Studenmund
On Sat, 13 Oct 2001, Bill Studenmund wrote: > On Sat, 13 Oct 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > > > I also wonder how the fixed, single-level namespace search path you > > describe interacts with the SQL rules for schema search. (I don't > > actually know what those rules are offhand; haven't yet read the