[HACKERS] nested hstore - large insert crashes server

2014-02-04 Thread Erik Rijkers
CentOS Release 6.5 (final) AMD FX(tm)-8120 Eight-Core 2.6.32-431.3.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Jan 3 21:39:27 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux memory: 8GB I am testing nested hstore, on a server with both with these patches: jsonb-9.patch.gz nested-hstore-9.patch.gz One of the first

Re: [HACKERS] nested hstore - large insert crashes server

2014-02-04 Thread Christian Kruse
Hi, On 04/02/14 17:41, Erik Rijkers wrote: 2014-02-04 10:34:25.376 CET 29133 LOG: server process (PID 29459) was terminated by signal 9: Killed Did you check if this was the OOM killer? Should be logged in dmesg. Best regards, -- Christian Kruse http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/

Re: [HACKERS] nested hstore - large insert crashes server

2014-02-04 Thread Erik Rijkers
On Tue, February 4, 2014 18:56, Christian Kruse wrote: Hi, On 04/02/14 17:41, Erik Rijkers wrote: 2014-02-04 10:34:25.376 CET 29133 LOG: server process (PID 29459) was terminated by signal 9: Killed Did you check if this was the OOM killer? Should be logged in dmesg. I would be

Re: [HACKERS] nested hstore - large insert crashes server

2014-02-04 Thread Tom Lane
Erik Rijkers e...@xs4all.nl writes: On Tue, February 4, 2014 18:56, Christian Kruse wrote: Did you check if this was the OOM killer? Should be logged in dmesg. I would be surprised if it wasn't. (no access to that machine at the moment) How do we regard such crashes? It seems to me this was

Re: [HACKERS] nested hstore - large insert crashes server

2014-02-04 Thread Stephen Frost
* Erik Rijkers (e...@xs4all.nl) wrote: On Tue, February 4, 2014 18:56, Christian Kruse wrote: On 04/02/14 17:41, Erik Rijkers wrote: 2014-02-04 10:34:25.376 CET 29133 LOG: server process (PID 29459) was terminated by signal 9: Killed Did you check if this was the OOM killer? Should be