[HACKERS] new full vacuum doesn't work

2010-01-08 Thread Pavel Stehule
Hello I am testing vacuum changes, and I found some strange behave: autovacuum off [pa...@nemesis src]$ /usr/local/pgsql/bin/pgbench -i -F 10 -s 10 test NOTICE: table pgbench_branches does not exist, skipping NOTICE: table pgbench_tellers does not exist, skipping NOTICE: table

Re: [HACKERS] new full vacuum doesn't work

2010-01-08 Thread Takahiro Itagaki
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote: I am testing vacuum changes, and I found some strange behave: Did you need SET (fillfactor=100) before vACUUM FULL? =# select * from pgstattuple('pgbench_accounts'); -[ RECORD 1 ]--+--- table_len | 1365336064 tuple_count

Re: [HACKERS] new full vacuum doesn't work

2010-01-08 Thread Pavel Stehule
2010/1/8 Takahiro Itagaki itagaki.takah...@oss.ntt.co.jp: Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote: I am testing vacuum changes, and I found some strange behave: Did you need SET (fillfactor=100) before vACUUM FULL? no, I tested it and with FILLFACTOR 100 VACUUM FULL is successful.

Re: [HACKERS] new full vacuum doesn't work

2010-01-08 Thread Takahiro Itagaki
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote: Personally I thing, so this behave is bad. Or there is wrong default fillfactor 0. No, you used fillfactor=10 here: [pa...@nemesis src]$ /usr/local/pgsql/bin/pgbench -i -F 10 -s 10 test ~

Re: [HACKERS] new full vacuum doesn't work

2010-01-08 Thread Pavel Stehule
2010/1/8 Takahiro Itagaki itagaki.takah...@oss.ntt.co.jp: Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote: Personally I thing, so this behave is bad. Or there is wrong default fillfactor 0. No, you used fillfactor=10 here: [pa...@nemesis src]$ /usr/local/pgsql/bin/pgbench -i -F 10 -s 10 test