Re: [HACKERS] new keywords in 9.1

2011-03-15 Thread Mike Fowler
On 12/03/11 05:18, Robert Haas wrote: XMLEXISTS is pretty horrible in that the syntax apparently requires three new keywords (XMLEXISTS, PASSING, REF) which is pretty lame but I guess it's specified by the standard so I'm not sure there's much we can do about it. The rest look reasonable and nec

Re: [HACKERS] new keywords in 9.1

2011-03-15 Thread Robert Haas
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 1:36 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas writes: >> It looks like 9.1 currently introduces 11 new keywords: ATTRIBUTE, >> COLLATION, EXTENSION, LABEL, NOREPLICATION, PASSING, REF, REPLICATION, >> UNLOGGED, VALIDATE, and XMLEXISTS.  Aside from VALIDATE, which is >> already be

Re: [HACKERS] new keywords in 9.1

2011-03-11 Thread Tom Lane
Robert Haas writes: > It looks like 9.1 currently introduces 11 new keywords: ATTRIBUTE, > COLLATION, EXTENSION, LABEL, NOREPLICATION, PASSING, REF, REPLICATION, > UNLOGGED, VALIDATE, and XMLEXISTS. Aside from VALIDATE, which is > already being discussed on another thread, are there any of these

[HACKERS] new keywords in 9.1

2011-03-11 Thread Robert Haas
It looks like 9.1 currently introduces 11 new keywords: ATTRIBUTE, COLLATION, EXTENSION, LABEL, NOREPLICATION, PASSING, REF, REPLICATION, UNLOGGED, VALIDATE, and XMLEXISTS. Aside from VALIDATE, which is already being discussed on another thread, are there any of these that we can/should try to get