Re: [HACKERS] new tests post-feature freeze (was pgsql: Add TAP tests for pg_dump)

On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 11:22 PM, Noah Misch wrote: > Some or even most of the other tests would qualify under "closely related to > ... a feature that is new in 9.6". Your 9.6 pg_dump changes affected object > selection and catalog extraction for most object types, so I think

Re: [HACKERS] new tests post-feature freeze (was pgsql: Add TAP tests for pg_dump)

Robert Haas writes: > My suggestion is that, from this point forward, we add new tests to > 9.6 only if they are closely related to a bug that is getting fixed or > a feature that is new in 9.6. I think that's a reasonable compromise, > but what do others think? Yeah,

Re: [HACKERS] new tests post-feature freeze (was pgsql: Add TAP tests for pg_dump)

On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Stephen Frost wrote: > * Peter Eisentraut (peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: >> On 5/7/16 9:36 AM, Stephen Frost wrote: >> >Honestly, over the next couple of months between feature-freeze and >> >release, I'd like to add even more tests,