Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > What I'm after is not freezing for read-only media, nor archive, nor
> > read-only tables. What I'm after is removing the requirement that all
> > databases must be vacuumed wholly every 2 billion transactions.
>
> Well, if that's t
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've been taking a look at what's needed for the non-transactional part
> of pg_class. If I've understood this correctly, we need a separate
> catalog, which I've dubbed pg_ntclass (better ideas welcome), and a new
> pointer in RelationData to hold a po
Hi,
I've been taking a look at what's needed for the non-transactional part
of pg_class. If I've understood this correctly, we need a separate
catalog, which I've dubbed pg_ntclass (better ideas welcome), and a new
pointer in RelationData to hold a pointer to this new catalog for each
relation.
