Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The numeric_big regression test was added many years ago for the NUMERIC
> implementation but was not put in the default test set because it was
> too slow. Now my tests show, it is really not slower than some of the
> other slow tests (e.g., sta
The numeric_big regression test was added many years ago for the NUMERIC
implementation but was not put in the default test set because it was
too slow. Now my tests show, it is really not slower than some of the
other slow tests (e.g., stats, tablespace), so perhaps time has caught
up with u
