Tom Lane wrote:
I wrote:
Andrew Dunstan writes:
In my original patch, I looked at all the dependencies of a candidate
item ansd compared them with the dependencies of the running items to
see if there was a potential locking clash. However, Tom in his
admirable reworking of my patc
I wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan writes:
>> In my original patch, I looked at all the dependencies of a candidate
>> item ansd compared them with the dependencies of the running items to
>> see if there was a potential locking clash. However, Tom in his
>> admirable reworking of my patch, restricted t
Andrew Dunstan writes:
> OK, I've worked out why I am seeing deadlocks etc. from parallel restore
> on FK items.
> In my original patch, I looked at all the dependencies of a candidate
> item ansd compared them with the dependencies of the running items to
> see if there was a potential lockin
OK, I've worked out why I am seeing deadlocks etc. from parallel restore
on FK items.
In my original patch, I looked at all the dependencies of a candidate
item ansd compared them with the dependencies of the running items to
see if there was a potential locking clash. However, Tom in his
a
