Andrew Dunstan írta:
Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote:
Martijn van Oosterhout írta:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 11:19:40AM +0200, Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote:
The problem comes from cases like
colname coltype DEFAULT 5! GENERATED ...
Since b_expr allows postfix operators, it takes one more token of
l
Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote:
Martijn van Oosterhout írta:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 11:19:40AM +0200, Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote:
The problem comes from cases like
colname coltype DEFAULT 5! GENERATED ...
Since b_expr allows postfix operators, it takes one more token of
lookahead than we have
Martijn van Oosterhout írta:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 11:19:40AM +0200, Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote:
The problem comes from cases like
colname coltype DEFAULT 5! GENERATED ...
Since b_expr allows postfix operators, it takes one more token of
lookahead than we have to tell if the default
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 11:19:40AM +0200, Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote:
> >The problem comes from cases like
> >
> > colname coltype DEFAULT 5! GENERATED ...
> >
> >Since b_expr allows postfix operators, it takes one more token of
> >lookahead than we have to tell if the default expression is "5!"
Tom Lane írta:
...
If anyone seriously wants to propose removing postfix ops from b_expr,
we'd better take it up on someplace more widely read than -patches.
regards, tom lane
OK, I take the bullet and send it to -hackers.
For everyone who don't read -patches, let m
