On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> Josh - you may want to add your patch here:
>
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view/open
Added, thanks!
Josh
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
h
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
>> You know, I've never really understood the difference between these
>> two types of things, or why we need to support both. Which may be
>> just because I'm slow?
>
> Unique constraints are defined by the SQL standard, an
Robert Haas writes:
> You know, I've never really understood the difference between these
> two types of things, or why we need to support both. Which may be
> just because I'm slow?
Unique constraints are defined by the SQL standard, and have a syntax
that can't support a lot of the extensions
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
> Addressing TODO item "Distinguish between unique indexes and unique
> constraints in \d+" for psql, and picking up from thread:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/8780.1271187...@sss.pgh.pa.us
>
> Attached is a simple patch which
Addressing TODO item "Distinguish between unique indexes and unique
constraints in \d+" for psql, and picking up from thread:
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/8780.1271187...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Attached is a simple patch which clarifies unique constraints with
"UNIQUE CONSTRAINT" in psql's \d+
