Hello
2012/9/24 Heikki Linnakangas :
> Having read through this thread, the consensus seems to be that we don't
> want this patch as it is (and I agree with that).
>
> As I understand it, you are trying to solve two problems:
>
> 1. Passing parameters to a DO statement. You could quote the paramet
Having read through this thread, the consensus seems to be that we don't
want this patch as it is (and I agree with that).
As I understand it, you are trying to solve two problems:
1. Passing parameters to a DO statement. You could quote the parameters
and inline them in the block itself in th
2012/8/31 Dimitri Fontaine :
> Pavel Stehule writes:
>>> Pavel, you didn't say what you think about the WITH FUNCTION proposal?
>>
>> I don't like it - this proposal is too "lispish" - it is not SQL
>
> We're not doing lambda here, only extending a facility that we rely on
> today. The function wo
Pavel Stehule writes:
>> Pavel, you didn't say what you think about the WITH FUNCTION proposal?
>
> I don't like it - this proposal is too "lispish" - it is not SQL
We're not doing lambda here, only extending a facility that we rely on
today. The function would be named, for one. I don't know wha
2012/8/31 Dimitri Fontaine :
> Pavel Stehule writes:
>> a motivation for this patch was discussion about parametrised DO
>> statement - and simple possibility of access to host variables (psql)
>> variables from server - PL scripts.
>
> Pavel, you didn't say what you think about the WITH FUNCTION
Pavel Stehule writes:
> a motivation for this patch was discussion about parametrised DO
> statement - and simple possibility of access to host variables (psql)
> variables from server - PL scripts.
Pavel, you didn't say what you think about the WITH FUNCTION proposal?
And you didn't say how do
Robert Haas writes:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Pavel Stehule
> wrote:
>> 2012/8/30 Robert Haas :
>>> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 3:46 AM, Pavel Stehule
>>> wrote:
patch that implements "shared" client/server session variables
>>> I don't really see what we can do with this that we ca
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2012/8/30 Robert Haas :
>> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 3:46 AM, Pavel Stehule
>> wrote:
>>> patch that implements "shared" client/server session variables
>>
>> I don't really see what we can do with this that we can't do without this.
>
> a mo
2012/8/30 Robert Haas :
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 3:46 AM, Pavel Stehule
> wrote:
>> patch that implements "shared" client/server session variables
>
> I don't really see what we can do with this that we can't do without this.
a motivation for this patch was discussion about parametrised DO
stat
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 3:46 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> patch that implements "shared" client/server session variables
I don't really see what we can do with this that we can't do without this.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent
Hello
patch that implements "shared" client/server session variables
Regards
Pavel Stehule
shared_variables-01.diff
Description: Binary data
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-ha
11 matches
Mail list logo
