On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 10:46 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Ashutosh Bapat
> wrote:
>> If a partitioned table is proven dummy, set_rel_pathlist() doesn't mark the
>> partition relations dummy and thus doesn't set
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Ashutosh Bapat
wrote:
> If a partitioned table is proven dummy, set_rel_pathlist() doesn't mark the
> partition relations dummy and thus doesn't set any (dummy) paths in the
> partition relations. The lack of paths in the
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
wrote:
> Hello,
Thanks for the review.
>> If a partitioned table is proven dummy, set_rel_pathlist() doesn't mark the
>> partition relations dummy and thus doesn't set any (dummy) paths in the
>> partition
Hello,
At Thu, 6 Jul 2017 21:05:21 +0530, Ashutosh Bapat
wrote in
> If a partitioned table is proven dummy, set_rel_pathlist() doesn't mark the
> partition relations dummy and thus doesn't set
If a partitioned table is proven dummy, set_rel_pathlist() doesn't mark the
partition relations dummy and thus doesn't set any (dummy) paths in the
partition relations. The lack of paths in the partitions means that we can
not use partition-wise join while joining this table with some other