Re: [HACKERS] paths in partitions of a dummy partitioned table

2017-09-06 Thread Ashutosh Bapat
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 10:46 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Ashutosh Bapat > wrote: >> If a partitioned table is proven dummy, set_rel_pathlist() doesn't mark the >> partition relations dummy and thus doesn't set

Re: [HACKERS] paths in partitions of a dummy partitioned table

2017-08-25 Thread Robert Haas
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: > If a partitioned table is proven dummy, set_rel_pathlist() doesn't mark the > partition relations dummy and thus doesn't set any (dummy) paths in the > partition relations. The lack of paths in the

Re: [HACKERS] paths in partitions of a dummy partitioned table

2017-07-10 Thread Ashutosh Bapat
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote: > Hello, Thanks for the review. >> If a partitioned table is proven dummy, set_rel_pathlist() doesn't mark the >> partition relations dummy and thus doesn't set any (dummy) paths in the >> partition

Re: [HACKERS] paths in partitions of a dummy partitioned table

2017-07-10 Thread Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Hello, At Thu, 6 Jul 2017 21:05:21 +0530, Ashutosh Bapat wrote in > If a partitioned table is proven dummy, set_rel_pathlist() doesn't mark the > partition relations dummy and thus doesn't set

[HACKERS] paths in partitions of a dummy partitioned table

2017-07-06 Thread Ashutosh Bapat
If a partitioned table is proven dummy, set_rel_pathlist() doesn't mark the partition relations dummy and thus doesn't set any (dummy) paths in the partition relations. The lack of paths in the partitions means that we can not use partition-wise join while joining this table with some other