Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> any new thoughts on the matter? Perhaps someone is already working
>> on it?
>
> It is still a wanted feature, but a couple of people have offered
> patches and I'm waiting for them ...
>
Aha, good. I was considering taking a stab at it, but under the
circumstances will
Martin Pihlak escribió:
> There is an autovacuum TODO item suggesting pg_autovacuum to be
> replaced with pg_class.reloptions. Original discussion at:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-02/msg01440.php
>
> A lot of time has passed -- is the proposal still valid or are there
> any
There is an autovacuum TODO item suggesting pg_autovacuum to be
replaced with pg_class.reloptions. Original discussion at:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-02/msg01440.php
A lot of time has passed -- is the proposal still valid or are there
any new thoughts on the matter? Perhaps
