Re: [HACKERS] performance results on IBM POWER7

2012-03-05 Thread Robert Haas
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Ants Aasma wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Robert Haas wrote: >>> ... After that I think maybe some testing of the >>> remaining CommitFest patches might be in order (though personally I'd >>> like t

Re: [HACKERS] performance results on IBM POWER7

2012-03-01 Thread Robert Haas
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Ants Aasma wrote: > On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Robert Haas wrote: >> ... After that I think maybe some testing of the >> remaining CommitFest patches might be in order (though personally I'd >> like to wrap this CommitFest up fairly soon) to see if any of tho

Re: [HACKERS] performance results on IBM POWER7

2012-03-01 Thread Ants Aasma
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > ... After that I think maybe some testing of the > remaining CommitFest patches might be in order (though personally I'd > like to wrap this CommitFest up fairly soon) to see if any of those > improve things. Besides performance testing, could

[HACKERS] performance results on IBM POWER7

2012-03-01 Thread Robert Haas
IBM has provided the PostgreSQL community with access to a couple of IBM POWER7 machines through OSUOSL. Simon has access to one, carved up into a couple of LPARs, for replication work, and there's a buildfarm animal on there as well, I think; I have access to the other, for performance testing.