> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew T. O'Connor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 10 August 2004 21:41
> To: Tom Lane
> Cc: Dave Page; PostgreSQL-development;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Bruce Momjian
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_autovacuum Win32 Service Code
Tom Lane wrote:
"Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Some time ago I posted a patch to allow pg_autovacuum to be run as a
service on Windows, on the understanding that if pg_autovacuum didn't
make it into the backend, it would be applied. I followed up Tom's
message to Matthew apologising for no
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Some time ago I posted a patch to allow pg_autovacuum to be run as a
> > service on Windows, on the understanding that if pg_autovacuum didn't
> > make it into the backend, it would be applied. I followed up Tom's
> > message to Matthew
"Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Some time ago I posted a patch to allow pg_autovacuum to be run as a
> service on Windows, on the understanding that if pg_autovacuum didn't
> make it into the backend, it would be applied. I followed up Tom's
> message to Matthew apologising for not includ
Some time ago I posted a patch to allow pg_autovacuum to be run as a
service on Windows, on the understanding that if pg_autovacuum didn't
make it into the backend, it would be applied. I followed up Tom's
message to Matthew apologising for not including his backend integration
patches with a reque
