On Wednesday 21 April 2004 12:05 am, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> >> No, I have not heard of a 7.4.3 timeline, but we certainly want your
> >> eventual fixes in that release.
> >
> > Right, and along these lines there are a few other pg_autovacuum bugs
> > that were fixed just after 7.4.2.
>
>
"Matthew T. O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> System Tables: pg_autovacuum treats non-shared system tables just like
> any other table. It monitors the activity and vacuums when it deems it
> appropriate. As for shared system tables: In user databases they are
> only analyzed by pg_auto
No, I have not heard of a 7.4.3 timeline, but we certainly want your
eventual fixes in that release.
Right, and along these lines there are a few other pg_autovacuum bugs
that were fixed just after 7.4.2.
A rollable log solution would be nice :) Syslog? :)
Chris
---(end
Bruce Momjian wrote:
No, I have not heard of a 7.4.3 timeline, but we certainly want your
eventual fixes in that release.
Right, and along these lines there are a few other pg_autovacuum bugs
that were fixed just after 7.4.2.
---(end of broadcast)--
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
Does pg_autovacuum vacuum and analyze system catalog and TOAST tables
properly?
Properly? I think so, that is to the best of my knowledge which is a
bit limited :-)
Toast Tables: pg_autovacuum doesn't do anything to toast tables
explicitly. I am not aware th
I looked into this and I see a number of cases where pg_autovacuum calls
send_query(), but doesn't test for a NULL return from the function.
Matthew, would you look into this and submit a patch? Thanks.
Does pg_autovacuum vacuum and analyze system catalog and TOAST tables
properly?
Chris
--
Yeah, I will, I just don't know when. I have been trying to get to this
and lots of other pg_autovacuum tasks, but my schedule has been quite
crazy as of late. Anyway, this should probably be a pretty simple patch,
so I can probably find some time to look at it soon.
Any idea on the 7.4.3 releas
Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
> Yeah, I will, I just don't know when. I have been trying to get to this
> and lots of other pg_autovacuum tasks, but my schedule has been quite
> crazy as of late. Anyway, this should probably be a pretty simple patch,
> so I can probably find some time to look at it
Bruce Momjian wrote:
I looked into this and I see a number of cases where pg_autovacuum calls
send_query(), but doesn't test for a NULL return from the function.
Matthew, would you look into this and submit a patch? Thanks.
Should pg_autovacuum be vacuuming temporary tables? Secondly, why wo
I looked into this and I see a number of cases where pg_autovacuum calls
send_query(), but doesn't test for a NULL return from the function.
Matthew, would you look into this and submit a patch? Thanks.
---
Jeff Boes wrote
10 matches
Mail list logo
