On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 6:28 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On sön, 2012-06-10 at 13:43 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> > On tis, 2012-05-29 at 22:31 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> >> Yeah, good arguments all around, i agree too :-) Nex
On 11 June 2012 22:40, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:28 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On sön, 2012-06-10 at 13:43 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> > On tis, 2012-05-29 at 22:31 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> >
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:28 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On sön, 2012-06-10 at 13:43 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> > On tis, 2012-05-29 at 22:31 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> >> Yeah, good arguments all around, i agree too :-) Ne
On sön, 2012-06-10 at 13:43 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On tis, 2012-05-29 at 22:31 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >> Yeah, good arguments all around, i agree too :-) Next question is -
> >> suggestions for naming of said paramter?
>
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> On tis, 2012-05-29 at 22:31 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
Yeah, good arguments all around, i agree too :-) Next questi
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On tis, 2012-05-29 at 22:31 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> Yeah, good arguments all around, i agree too :-) Next question is -
>>> suggestions for naming of said paramter?
>>
>>
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On tis, 2012-05-29 at 22:31 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> Yeah, good arguments all around, i agree too :-) Next question is -
>> suggestions for naming of said paramter?
>
> --xlog-method=something? And/or -Xsomething, which would autom
On tis, 2012-05-29 at 22:31 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Yeah, good arguments all around, i agree too :-) Next question is -
> suggestions for naming of said paramter?
--xlog-method=something? And/or -Xsomething, which would automatically
enable -x?
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (p
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 2:03 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
In 9.1, the pg_basebackup option --xlog takes no argument. In
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 2:03 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> In 9.1, the pg_basebackup option --xlog takes no argument. In 9.2, it
>>> takes a required argument. I think such compa
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> In 9.1, the pg_basebackup option --xlog takes no argument. In 9.2, it
>> takes a required argument. I think such compatibility breaks should be
>> avoided, especially in client
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:38 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> In 9.1, the pg_basebackup option --xlog takes no argument. In 9.2, it
>> takes a required argument. I think such compatibility breaks should be
>> avoided, especially in client
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> In 9.1, the pg_basebackup option --xlog takes no argument. In 9.2, it
> takes a required argument. I think such compatibility breaks should be
> avoided, especially in client-side programs. Now you can't write a
> script running pg_bas
In 9.1, the pg_basebackup option --xlog takes no argument. In 9.2, it
takes a required argument. I think such compatibility breaks should be
avoided, especially in client-side programs. Now you can't write a
script running pg_basebackup that works with 9.1 and 9.2, if you need to
include the WAL
14 matches
Mail list logo