On 06/21/2017 02:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan writes:
>> On 06/21/2017 11:30 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Andrew Dunstan writes:
Unfortunately this seems precluded by the use of the non-standard
"err.h". It looks like that will trip us up on mingw also.
>>> Hm, why? Doesn't the
Andrew Dunstan writes:
> On 06/21/2017 11:30 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andrew Dunstan writes:
>>> Unfortunately this seems precluded by the use of the non-standard
>>> "err.h". It looks like that will trip us up on mingw also.
>> Hm, why? Doesn't the -I search path get the right thing?
> The file
On 06/21/2017 11:30 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan writes:
>> Unfortunately this seems precluded by the use of the non-standard
>> "err.h". It looks like that will trip us up on mingw also.
> Hm, why? Doesn't the -I search path get the right thing?
>
>
The file is
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2017-06-20 20:30:34 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Well, *I* don't care, but I thought we wanted to support Windows-using
>> developers as reasonably first-class citizens.
> The old one didn't have windows support either, right?
Not that I was aware of, but a large part of
On 2017-06-20 20:30:34 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Paquier writes:
> > On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Yeah, I thought it would work fine with Makefile-using Windows toolchains.
> >> But people who use MSVC need something else, no?
>
> > Are there that many anyway who
Andrew Dunstan writes:
> Unfortunately this seems precluded by the use of the non-standard
> "err.h". It looks like that will trip us up on mingw also.
Hm, why? Doesn't the -I search path get the right thing?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (p
On 06/21/2017 08:20 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 06/20/2017 08:30 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Michael Paquier writes:
>>> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Yeah, I thought it would work fine with Makefile-using Windows toolchains.
But people who use MSVC need something e
On 06/20/2017 08:30 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Paquier writes:
>> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Yeah, I thought it would work fine with Makefile-using Windows toolchains.
>>> But people who use MSVC need something else, no?
>> Are there that many anyway who care?
> Wel
Michael Paquier writes:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Yeah, I thought it would work fine with Makefile-using Windows toolchains.
>> But people who use MSVC need something else, no?
> Are there that many anyway who care?
Well, *I* don't care, but I thought we wanted to su
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeah, I thought it would work fine with Makefile-using Windows toolchains.
> But people who use MSVC need something else, no?
Are there that many anyway who care? Personally I already fallback to
Linux when it comes to indentation of Windows patc
Andrew Dunstan writes:
> On 06/20/2017 04:17 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> There's no Windows support yet, and I won't be writing that,
>> but I hope someone else will.
> What extra support do you think it needs? I have built it on Cygwin
> without touching a line of code, will probably be able to to th
On 06/20/2017 04:17 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I've set up a repo on our git server for the new improved version
> of pg_bsd_indent. Please test it for portability to your favorite
> platform(s) by doing
>
> git clone https://git.postgresql.org/git/pg_bsd_indent.git
> cd pg_bsd_indent
> make -s all
>
I've set up a repo on our git server for the new improved version
of pg_bsd_indent. Please test it for portability to your favorite
platform(s) by doing
git clone https://git.postgresql.org/git/pg_bsd_indent.git
cd pg_bsd_indent
make -s all
make check
Note you will need a PG installation in your
13 matches
Mail list logo
