On 9 November 2011 02:42, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
Why is this marked as done on with Wiki's todo list?
I assume you're referring to this item:
--
\dd is missing comments for several types of objects. Comments
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 3:38 AM, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
On 9 November 2011 02:42, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
Why is this marked as done on with Wiki's todo list?
I assume you're referring to this item:
On 17 October 2011 03:04, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Josh Kupershmidt schmi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On the third hand, Josh's previous batch of changes to clean up
psql's
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
Why is this marked as done on with Wiki's todo list?
I assume you're referring to this item:
--
\dd is missing comments for several types of objects. Comments are
not handled at all for some object types, and are handled by both
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 05:04, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hearing no cries of oh, yes, please, I'm marking this Returned with
Feedback for now. We can always revisit it if we hear that more
people want it.
I think this would be an improvement, but it's pretty low on my
wishlist.
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Josh Kupershmidt schmi...@gmail.com wrote:
On the third hand, Josh's previous batch of changes to clean up
psql's behavior in this area are clearly a huge improvement: you can
now
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Josh Kupershmidt schmi...@gmail.com wrote:
On the third hand, Josh's previous batch of changes to clean up
psql's behavior in this area are clearly a huge improvement: you can
now display the comment for nearly anything by running the appropriate
\dfoo command
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Josh Kupershmidt schmi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Thom Brown t...@linux.com wrote:
Just tested this out on current master. I tried this on every object
capable of having a comment, and the view reports all of them with the
correct
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
So, I think the critical question for this patch is do we want
this?.
Yep. Or put another way, are the gains worth having another system
view we'll have to maintain forever?
Tom didn't like it,
In [1], Tom seemed to be
Robert,
I noticed a problem at the definition of the view.
:
+UNION ALL
+SELECT
+ d.objoid, d.classoid, d.objsubid,
+ 'large object'::text AS objtype,
+ NULL::oid AS objnamespace,
+ d.objoid::text AS objname,
+ d.description
+FROM
+ pg_description d
+
2010/9/24 KaiGai Kohei kai...@ak.jp.nec.com:
If and when user create a table named 'pg_largeobject' on anywhere except
for the 'pg_catalog' schema, the (SELECT oid FROM pg_class WHERE relname =
'pg_largeobject') may not return 2613.
Oh, dear, how embarassing. Perhaps it should be written as:
KaiGai Kohei kai...@ak.jp.nec.com writes:
It seems to me the query should be fixed up as follows:
:
WHERE
d.classoid = (SELECT oid FROM pg_class WHERE relname = 'pg_largeobject'
AND relnamespace = (SELECT oid FROM pg_namespace
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
In view of the foregoing problems, I'd like to propose adding a new
system view, tentatively called pg_comments, which lists all of the
comments for everything in the system in such a
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
In view of the foregoing problems, I'd like to propose adding a new
system view, tentatively called pg_comments, which lists all of the
comments for everything in the system in such a way that it's
reasonably possible to do further filtering out the
14 matches
Mail list logo
