Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane writes:
>> What should the option be called?
> If you accept the Linux Standards Base as a precedent for the other
> options, it should be "reload".
Works for me.
regards, tom lane
---(end o
Tom Lane writes:
> Any objections?
No. Definitely needed.
> What should the option be called? "pg_ctl hup" is short but maybe too
> Unix-sysadminy; perhaps something like "pg_ctl reconfig"?
If you accept the Linux Standards Base as a precedent for the other
options, it should be "reload". T
When modifying postgresql.conf (or, now, pg_hba.conf) one must send a
SIGHUP to the postmaster to get it to pay attention. Seems like it'd
be nice if pg_ctl had an option to do that, rather than having to muck
about with looking in ps output. Any objections? What should the
option be called? "
