Martijn van Oosterhout írta:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 02:36:41PM +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
>
The above is quite reproducable, "pg_ctl stop -m immediate"
"usually" inflated my serial sequence, but I had two occasions
when not. The 69 -> 70 was one. The inflated increase is
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 02:36:41PM +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
> >> The above is quite reproducable, "pg_ctl stop -m immediate"
> >> "usually" inflated my serial sequence, but I had two occasions
> >> when not. The 69 -> 70 was one. The inflated increase is always 33:
> >
> > AFAIKS sequences
Bernd Helmle írta:
>
>
> --On 10. April 2010 09:26:41 +0200 Boszormenyi Zoltan
> wrote:
>
>> The above is quite reproducable, "pg_ctl stop -m immediate"
>> "usually" inflated my serial sequence, but I had two occasions
>> when not. The 69 -> 70 was one. The inflated increase is always 33:
>
> AFAI
--On 10. April 2010 09:26:41 +0200 Boszormenyi Zoltan
wrote:
The above is quite reproducable, "pg_ctl stop -m immediate"
"usually" inflated my serial sequence, but I had two occasions
when not. The 69 -> 70 was one. The inflated increase is always 33:
AFAIKS sequences are pre-logged with
Boszormenyi Zoltan írta:
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to test HS/SR and have setup two instances, one primary
> and one secondary, the secondary is obviously a copy of the primary
> while pg_start_backup() was in effect.
>
> I started up the secondary server after "SELECT pg_stop_backup()" on
> the primary.
Hi,
I wanted to test HS/SR and have setup two instances, one primary
and one secondary, the secondary is obviously a copy of the primary
while pg_start_backup() was in effect.
I started up the secondary server after "SELECT pg_stop_backup()" on
the primary. I stopped and started the primary with
