I wrote:
> Attached is a draft patch that does things this way.
BTW, the bulk of the changes in this patch are just there to pass down
the DumpOptions struct to where it's needed, following some pre-existing
work that passed that around as a separate pointer. I wonder why things
were done that wa
I wrote:
> I looked into Karsten Hilbert's report here
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160108114529.gb22...@hermes.hilbert.loc
> of being unable to run pg_upgrade on a database containing the pg_trgm
> extension. After some investigation, the problem is explained like this:
> ...
> The th
I looked into Karsten Hilbert's report here
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160108114529.gb22...@hermes.hilbert.loc
of being unable to run pg_upgrade on a database containing the pg_trgm
extension. After some investigation, the problem is explained like this:
1. Karsten had installed pg_tr
