Re: [HACKERS] pg_restore bug on win32

2005-09-10 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Tony Caduto wrote: Tom Lane wrote: Hmm. The only relevant-looking change between 8.0.0 and 8.0.1 is this one: http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/bin/pg_dump/pg_backup_archiver.c.diff?r1=1.101.4.2;r2=1.101.4.3;f=h I wonder if this could be messing up the password accepta

Re: [HACKERS] pg_restore bug on win32

2005-09-10 Thread Tony Caduto
Tom Lane wrote: I wrote: Hmm. The only relevant-looking change between 8.0.0 and 8.0.1 is this one: http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/bin/pg_dump/pg_backup_archiver.c.diff?r1=1.101.4.2;r2=1.101.4.3;f=h I wonder if this could be messing up the password acceptance --- for i

Re: [HACKERS] pg_restore bug on win32

2005-09-10 Thread Tom Lane
I wrote: > Hmm. The only relevant-looking change between 8.0.0 and 8.0.1 is > this one: > http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/bin/pg_dump/pg_backup_archiver.c.diff?r1=1.101.4.2;r2=1.101.4.3;f=h > I wonder if this could be messing up the password acceptance --- for > instance, by c

Re: [HACKERS] pg_restore bug on win32

2005-09-10 Thread Tom Lane
Tony Caduto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > basicly pg_restore prompts for the password, but no matter what you > enter it fails, the only way it works is to have > the server pg_hba.conf file set to trust. version 8.0.0 works, so it > was the result of some change in versions later than 8.0.0 Hm

[HACKERS] pg_restore bug on win32

2005-09-10 Thread Tony Caduto
I have verfied this bug exists in all pg_restore versions greater than 8.0.0 Someone else reported it way back in Feb: http://groups.google.com/group/mailing.database.pgsql-bugs/browse_thread/thread/4dacdd43b894a2c3/e59e3203bb22745b?lnk=st&q=pg_restore+password+authentication+failed&rnum=9&hl=en#e