Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com writes:
pg_dump allows us to select multiple target tables by using
multiple -t switches, but pg_restore does not. So, when
restoring multiple tables, we have to run pg_restore more
than once as follows. This is a pain to me.
Use the list facilities, options
Hi,
pg_dump allows us to select multiple target tables by using
multiple -t switches, but pg_restore does not. So, when
restoring multiple tables, we have to run pg_restore more
than once as follows. This is a pain to me.
$ pg_restore -t tbl1 db.dump
$ pg_restore -t tbl2 db.dump
Is it
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 05:13:22PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
Hi,
pg_dump allows us to select multiple target tables by using
multiple -t switches, but pg_restore does not. So, when
restoring multiple tables, we have to run pg_restore more
than once as follows. This is a pain to me.
$
On Tue, August 10, 2010 13:18, David Fetter wrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 05:13:22PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
Is it worth allowing pg_restore to accept multiple -t
switches as well as pg_dump?
$ pg_restore -t tbl1 -t tbl2 db.dump
Regards,
Yes. :)
What other functionality in
Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com writes:
Is it worth allowing pg_restore to accept multiple -t
switches as well as pg_dump?
It's on the TODO list already, no?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:00 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com writes:
Is it worth allowing pg_restore to accept multiple -t
switches as well as pg_dump?
It's on the TODO list already, no?
Thanks! I found it on the list and understood there are other