Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project: high-level design proposal of

2005-06-04 Thread Serguei A. Mokhov
On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 19:33:40 -0400 (EDT) > > I have added a link to this thread on the TODO list under TODO.detail. Thanks Bruce (and Josh Berkus) for reminding me about this. I should be able to follow this up in early July. -s > Serguei A. Mokhov w

Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project: high-level design proposal of in-place

2005-06-04 Thread Bruce Momjian
I have added a link to this thread on the TODO list under TODO.detail. --- Serguei A. Mokhov wrote: > Hello dear all, > > [Please CC your replies to me as I am on the digest mode] > > Here's finally a very high-level desig

Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project: high-level design proposal of

2004-09-30 Thread Serguei A. Mokhov
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Tom Lane wrote: > Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:36:02 -0400 > > "Serguei A. Mokhov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Comments are very welcome, especially _*CONSTRUCTIVE*_... > > This is fundamentally wrong, because you are assigning the storage > manager functionality that it does

Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade project: high-level design proposal of in-place upgrade facility

2004-09-30 Thread Tom Lane
"Serguei A. Mokhov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Comments are very welcome, especially _*CONSTRUCTIVE*_... This is fundamentally wrong, because you are assigning the storage manager functionality that it does not have. In particular, the storage manager knows nothing of the contents or format of

[HACKERS] pg_upgrade project: high-level design proposal of in-place upgrade facility

2004-09-30 Thread Serguei A. Mokhov
Hello dear all, [Please CC your replies to me as I am on the digest mode] Here's finally a very high-level design proposal of the pg_upgrade feature I was handwaiving a couple of weeks ago. Since, I am almost done with the moving, I can allocate some time for this for 8.1/8.2. If this topic is o