Re: [HACKERS] pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i as plain i, because

2006-09-23 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 12:29:05PM -0300, Tom Lane wrote: Log Message: --- We're going to have to spell dotless i as plain i, because dotless i is not in the character set supported by DocBook nor standard HTML. (Sorry Volkan.) Also replace random character-set references by a

Re: [HACKERS] pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i as plain i, because

2006-09-23 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: Well you could always use te HTML4 #305; which most tools should understand. At least browsers have good support for this kind of entity. Please review the recent thread on pgsql-docs before reiterating all the suggestions. -- Peter Eisentraut

Re: [HACKERS] pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i as plain i, because

2006-09-23 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 11:54:47AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: Well you could always use te HTML4 #305; which most tools should understand. At least browsers have good support for this kind of entity. Please review the recent thread on pgsql-docs before

Re: [HACKERS] pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i as plain i, because

2006-09-23 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: Oh sorry, it wasn't clear from the commit entry. It's not that DocBook doesn't support the character or that it can't be represented. It's just not supported in the document encoding we're using. No, no, and no. The reason that it doesn't work is that the