Re: [HACKERS] pgstatindex still throws ERROR: value "3220078592" is out of range for type integer

On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Takahiro Itagaki wrote: > > Dave Cramer wrote: > >> I noted on line 169 that max_avail is still an int ? Where else would >> it be having problems ? > > It should not a problem because the local variable only stores byte > size in a page. It will be at most only BL

Re: [HACKERS] pgstatindex still throws ERROR: value "3220078592" is out of range for type integer

Dave Cramer wrote: > I noted on line 169 that max_avail is still an int ? Where else would > it be having problems ? It should not a problem because the local variable only stores byte size in a page. It will be at most only BLCKSZ (=8192). I wonder why you had "ERROR: value ... is out of rang

[HACKERS] pgstatindex still throws ERROR: value "3220078592" is out of range for type integer

I noted on line 169 that max_avail is still an int ? Where else would it be having problems ? Dave -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers