Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom, I take it you have released gcc 3.2 right? It seems my ione is
> based on a CVS prerelease:
It's whatever came with RH 8.0 ...
$ gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/3.2/specs
Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --m
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 09:07:48AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> FWIW, I get the correct answer in CVS tip on Red Hat Linux 8.0, which
> is using gcc 3.2 (and -O2, per defaults in our makefiles):
Thanks Tom. I just wonder what's different in my makefile. It just does:
include $(top_builddir)/src/Makef
Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So here's the question comojng out of this all, anyone out here with an
> idea why the timestamp "Wed Jul 12 17:34:29 2000" becomes "Wed Jul 12
> 4649:34:26.02 2000" when putting it into timestamp format and back
> out. The function is almost identic
I found it, well not really that is. It seems the problem is triggered
by some gcc optimization. I'm using gcc 3.2.3. If I specify -O2 it does
not work correctly, without optimization it does. Now the big question
is which optimization is causing trouble.
It certainly is not -ffast-math as I do i
