Hi,
I found something strange (at least for my limited view).
in pl_exec.c:1549 in the function exec_stmt_case() we have this:
/* SQL2003 mandates this error if there was no ELSE clause */
if (!stmt-have_else)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_CASE_NOT_FOUND),
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Jaime Casanova
jcasa...@systemguards.com.ec wrote:
Hi,
[...]
this is based on General Rules case 1 of chapter 13.6 (case statement)
but i don't think that behaviour is the meaning of that Rule. Even if
it is, the exception should be: case not found for case
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Jaime Casanova
jcasa...@systemguards.com.ec wrote:
I found something strange (at least for my limited view).
in pl_exec.c:1549 in the function exec_stmt_case() we have this:
/* SQL2003 mandates this error if there was no ELSE clause */
if
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Jaime Casanova
jcasa...@systemguards.com.ec wrote:
this is based on General Rules case 1 of chapter 13.6 (case statement)
but i don't think that behaviour is the meaning of that Rule. Even if
it is, the exception
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
It seems odd to require a dummy ELSE clause that does nothing just to
avoid having an exception thrown, but I'm not sure what else to make
of the quoted portion of the spec. What do
Jaime Casanova jcasa...@systemguards.com.ec writes:
well actually i get here when translating the plpgsql messages and
found very strange a message like case not found, and as a last
argument (a weak one, i have to admit) i will say that the hint could
be innecesary if we use the same message
It seems odd to require a dummy ELSE clause that does nothing just to
avoid having an exception thrown, but I'm not sure what else to make
of the quoted portion of the spec. What do you think it's saying?
I thinking so it designed to be protected before processing CASE
statement without any
