Re: [HACKERS] postgresql.conf and postgres options

2001-01-25 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Bruce Momjian writes: > I have added all possible config options to postgresql.conf.sample. It was actually fully intentional that there was *no* list of all possible config options in the sample file, because 1) Who's going to maintain this? 2) People should read the documentation before mess

Re: [HACKERS] postgresql.conf and postgres options

2001-01-24 Thread Lamar Owen
Bruce Momjian wrote: > I have added all possible config options to postgresql.conf.sample. > I have attached the new version of the file. I think you will be amazed > at how GUC gives us such powerful control over PostgreSQL. Good. As a sysadmin I _like_ sample configs (which I usually rename

Re: [HACKERS] postgresql.conf and postgres options

2001-01-24 Thread Bruce Momjian
> Bruce Momjian writes: > > > I have added all possible config options to postgresql.conf.sample. > > It was actually fully intentional that there was *no* list of all possible > config options in the sample file, because > > 1) Who's going to maintain this? > > 2) People should read the docum

Re: [HACKERS] postgresql.conf and postgres options

2001-01-24 Thread Bruce Momjian
I have added all possible config options to postgresql.conf.sample. I have attached the new version of the file. I think you will be amazed at how GUC gives us such powerful control over PostgreSQL. Thanks, Peter. > Oliver Elphick writes: > > > 2. The following command line options to postgr

Re: [HACKERS] postgresql.conf and postgres options

2001-01-11 Thread Bruce Momjian
I think all valid options should appear in the options file. Right now, only a few are in there, I think. > I've just been looking through the options which can and cannot be set in > postgresql.conf and have a few points to raise. > > 1. There are some undocumented options which appear to re

Re: [HACKERS] postgresql.conf and postgres options

2001-01-11 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Oliver Elphick writes: > 2. The following command line options to postgres don't have an equivalent in > postgresql.conf. Is that intentional? (I suppose it is in several cases, > and I have left out some where it is obviously intentional.) I can't see > why these items can't be p

RE: [HACKERS] postgresql.conf and postgres options

2001-01-11 Thread Mikheev, Vadim
> 1. There are some undocumented options which appear to relate to WAL: ... > Is there any text anywhere to explain what these do? > (Point me to that or some commented code, and I'll write > a documentation patch.) I'll send description to you soon, thanks. Vadim

[HACKERS] postgresql.conf and postgres options

2001-01-11 Thread Oliver Elphick
I've just been looking through the options which can and cannot be set in postgresql.conf and have a few points to raise. 1. There are some undocumented options which appear to relate to WAL: NameVariableDefault Set by checkpoint_time