Re: [HACKERS] process type escape for log_line_prefix

2016-10-17 Thread Andres Freund
On 2016-10-15 17:43:40 -0700, Jeff Janes wrote: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Andres Freund wrote: > > > On 2016-10-14 13:11:51 +0200, Christoph Berg wrote: > > > Re: Michael Paquier 2016-02-10

Re: [HACKERS] process type escape for log_line_prefix

2016-10-15 Thread Jeff Janes
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2016-10-14 13:11:51 +0200, Christoph Berg wrote: > > Re: Michael Paquier 2016-02-10

Re: [HACKERS] process type escape for log_line_prefix

2016-10-14 Thread Andres Freund
On 2016-10-14 13:11:51 +0200, Christoph Berg wrote: > Re: Michael Paquier 2016-02-10 >

Re: [HACKERS] process type escape for log_line_prefix

2016-10-14 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Jeff Janes 2016-10-14

Re: [HACKERS] process type escape for log_line_prefix

2016-10-14 Thread Jeff Janes
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 4:11 AM, Christoph Berg wrote: > Re: Michael Paquier 2016-02-10

Re: [HACKERS] process type escape for log_line_prefix

2016-10-14 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Michael Paquier 2016-02-10

Re: [HACKERS] process type escape for log_line_prefix

2016-02-09 Thread Michael Paquier
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 11:32 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > Frequently when reading postgres logs to do some post mortem analysis > I'm left wondering what process emitted an error/log message. After the > fact it's often hard to know wether an error message was emitted by a >

[HACKERS] process type escape for log_line_prefix

2016-02-08 Thread Andres Freund
Hi, Frequently when reading postgres logs to do some post mortem analysis I'm left wondering what process emitted an error/log message. After the fact it's often hard to know wether an error message was emitted by a user backend or by something internal, say the checkpointer or autovacuum.