[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Eisentraut) writes:
> Am Montag, 26. November 2007 schrieb Tom Lane:
>> "Pavel Stehule" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > I propose new kind of FOR statement .. iteration over cursor,
>>
>> This seems useless and probably syntactically ambiguous.
>
> I think that is isomorph
On 26/11/2007, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Pavel Stehule" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I propose new kind of FOR statement .. iteration over cursor,
>
> This seems useless and probably syntactically ambiguous.
>
I don't see any syntactically problem and I have working prototype.
This
Am Montag, 26. November 2007 schrieb Tom Lane:
> "Pavel Stehule" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I propose new kind of FOR statement .. iteration over cursor,
>
> This seems useless and probably syntactically ambiguous.
I think that is isomorphic to what he mentioned as "better conformance with
P
"Pavel Stehule" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I propose new kind of FOR statement .. iteration over cursor,
This seems useless and probably syntactically ambiguous.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if postin
Hello
I propose new kind of FOR statement .. iteration over cursor, There
are two reasons:
a) better readability of procedure; - SQL statement is outside of statement,
b) better conformance with PL/SQL.
Sample:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION foo()
RETURNS void AS $$
DECLARE
c CURSOR(p integer)
