Was this addressed?
> Hiroshi Inoue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I assume this breakage is from the recent RELKIND_VIEW change;
> >> probably psql didn't get updated to know about the new relkind.
>
> > Probably psql uses pg_views though I don't remember correctly.
> > I
Hiroshi Inoue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I assume this breakage is from the recent RELKIND_VIEW change;
>> probably psql didn't get updated to know about the new relkind.
> Probably psql uses pg_views though I don't remember correctly.
> It seemd that pg_views(initdb) should
Tom Lane wrote:
> psql has some problems with views in current CVS: \d doesn't show views,
> and if you do \d on a specific view, it doesn't identify it as a view
> and doesn't show the view definition rule.
>
> I assume this breakage is from the recent RELKIND_VIEW change;
> probably psql didn'
psql has some problems with views in current CVS: \d doesn't show views,
and if you do \d on a specific view, it doesn't identify it as a view
and doesn't show the view definition rule.
I assume this breakage is from the recent RELKIND_VIEW change;
probably psql didn't get updated to know about t
