On Thursday 09 June 2005 22:03, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
Someone commented to me recently that they usually use psql's \x
expanded output mode, but find that it produces pretty illegible
results for psql slash commands such as \d. I can't really see a reason
you would _want_ expanded
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, Neil Conway wrote:
Someone commented to me recently that they usually use psql's \x expanded
output mode, but find that it produces pretty illegible results for psql
slash commands such as \d. I can't really see a reason you would _want_
expanded output mode for the
Someone commented to me recently that they usually use psql's \x
expanded output mode, but find that it produces pretty illegible
results for psql slash commands such as \d. I can't really see a reason
you would _want_ expanded output mode for the result sets of psql
slash commands. Would
Someone commented to me recently that they usually use psql's \x
expanded output mode, but find that it produces pretty illegible
results for psql slash commands such as \d. I can't really see a reason
you would _want_ expanded output mode for the result sets of psql
slash commands. Would
