Re: [HACKERS] psql document fix about showing FDW options

2011-08-11 Thread Robert Haas
2011/8/9 Shigeru Hanada shigeru.han...@gmail.com: postgres=# \d pgbench_accounts       Foreign table public.pgbench_accounts  Column  |     Type      | Modifiers |    Options --+---+---+---  aid      | integer       | not null  | {colname=aid}  bid    

Re: [HACKERS] psql document fix about showing FDW options

2011-08-11 Thread Shigeru Hanada
(2011/08/12 0:48), Robert Haas wrote: 2011/8/9 Shigeru Hanadashigeru.han...@gmail.com: postgres=# \d pgbench_accounts Foreign table public.pgbench_accounts Column | Type | Modifiers |Options --+---+---+--- aid | integer

Re: [HACKERS] psql document fix about showing FDW options

2011-08-11 Thread Robert Haas
2011/8/11 Shigeru Hanada shigeru.han...@gmail.com: Yeah, I have (hopefully) working FDW for PostgreSQL which is based on the one which has been proposed for 9.1, and updates done by Heikki. I've implemented:  * SELECT clause omitting  * WHERE clause pushdown (assuming remote has same

Re: [HACKERS] psql document fix about showing FDW options

2011-08-08 Thread Robert Haas
2011/8/8 Shigeru Hanada shigeru.han...@gmail.com: I noticed that psql document wrongly says that \d+ command shows per-table FDW options of a foreign table, but in fact, per-table FDW options are shown only in the result of \det+ command.  Attached patch removes this wrong description. This

[HACKERS] psql document fix about showing FDW options

2011-08-07 Thread Shigeru Hanada
I noticed that psql document wrongly says that \d+ command shows per-table FDW options of a foreign table, but in fact, per-table FDW options are shown only in the result of \det+ command. Attached patch removes this wrong description. This fix should be applied to 9.1 too. Regards, -- Shigeru