Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera writes:
> > So there's a minor issue on Takahiro-san fillfactor-on-toast patch,
> > which is that it does not hand out the last possible "kind" value. This
> > is a bits32 field, so at least theoretically on some platforms it will
> > be wider than 32 while on oth
Alvaro Herrera writes:
> So there's a minor issue on Takahiro-san fillfactor-on-toast patch,
> which is that it does not hand out the last possible "kind" value. This
> is a bits32 field, so at least theoretically on some platforms it will
> be wider than 32 while on others it will be exactly 32.
So there's a minor issue on Takahiro-san fillfactor-on-toast patch,
which is that it does not hand out the last possible "kind" value. This
is a bits32 field, so at least theoretically on some platforms it will
be wider than 32 while on others it will be exactly 32. I'm wondering
if this is the c
