On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2010-02/msg00174.php
>
>> I wonder if we should think about back-patching just the syscache.h
>> portion of that patch. It would simplify back-patching, and might
>> make lif
Robert Haas writes:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2010-02/msg00174.php
> I wonder if we should think about back-patching just the syscache.h
> portion of that patch. It would simplify back-patching, and might
> make life easier for people trying to write extensions that are
>
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Asko Tiidumaa wrote:
> Currently REASSIGN OWNED complains "unexpected classid" for operator
> class and family.
>
> For example,
>
> create two users, user1 and user2
>
> under user1:
> create type oxetype as enum ('oxe1');
> create operator class oxeops
> default
Currently REASSIGN OWNED complains "unexpected classid" for operator
class and family.
For example,
create two users, user1 and user2
under user1:
create type oxetype as enum ('oxe1');
create operator class oxeops
default for type oxetype using btree as
function 1 array_lower(anyarray,integer);
