On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Heikki Linnakangas hlinnakan...@vmware.com
wrote:
On 05/29/2014 07:39 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
It also implicitly tested the xlog parallel write slots thing, as that is
common code to all recovery.
During development, I hit a lot of bugs in that patch by
Hi Jeff,
On 2014-05-29 09:39:56 -0700, Jeff Janes wrote:
What features in 9.4 need more beta testing for recovery?
Another thing I'd like to add to the list is wal_level=logical. Not such
much the logical decoding side, but that we haven't screwed up normal
crash recovery/wal replay.
I also
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 9:44 PM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
On 2014-06-02 09:03:25 -0700, Jeff Janes wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com
I think this is useful information and can be even included in core
code.
I'd like to include
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 3:51 AM, Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:15 PM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:09 PM, Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com
Hi,
On 2014-06-02 09:03:25 -0700, Jeff Janes wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 3:51 AM, Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:15 PM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu,
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
Hi,
On 2014-06-02 09:03:25 -0700, Jeff Janes wrote:
GNU make does not realize that pg_xlogdump depends
on src/backend/access/rmgrdesc/heapdesc.c. (I don't know how or why it
has
that dependency, but changes
Hi,
On 2014-06-02 10:15:19 -0700, Jeff Janes wrote:
Also, pg_xlogdump -p insists on being given a start position. I
would
be nice if it could just find the first file in the given directory. Any
reason it can't do that, other than just that no one implemented it yet?
It
Jeff Janes wrote:
GNU make does not realize that pg_xlogdump depends
on src/backend/access/rmgrdesc/heapdesc.c. (I don't know how or why it has
that dependency, but changes did not take effect with a simple make
install) Is that a known issue? Is there someway to fix it?
Uh, you're right,
On 05/29/2014 07:39 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
It also implicitly tested the xlog parallel write slots thing, as that is
common code to all recovery.
During development, I hit a lot of bugs in that patch by setting
wal_buffers to 32kb (the minimum). Causes more backends to wait for each
other,
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:15 PM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:09 PM, Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
What features in 9.4 need more beta testing for recovery?
Another feature which have interaction with recovery is reduced WAL
for Update
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 09:39:56AM -0700, Jeff Janes wrote:
I've applied my partial-write testing harness to several scenarios in 9.4.
So far its found a recovery bug for gin indexes, a recovery bug for btree,
a vacuum bug for btree indexes (with foreign keys, but that is not relevant
to the
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 3:51 AM, Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:15 PM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:09 PM, Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com
wrote:
What features in 9.4 need more beta testing for recovery?
Another
What features in 9.4 need more beta testing for recovery?
I've applied my partial-write testing harness to several scenarios in 9.4.
So far its found a recovery bug for gin indexes, a recovery bug for btree,
a vacuum bug for btree indexes (with foreign keys, but that is not relevant
to the bug),
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 09:39:56AM -0700, Jeff Janes wrote:
What features in 9.4 need more beta testing for recovery?
I've applied my partial-write testing harness to several scenarios in 9.4. So
far its found a recovery bug for gin indexes, a recovery bug for btree, a
vacuum bug for btree
Jeff Janes wrote:
One thing is that I want to find a way to drive multixact in fast forward,
so that the freezing cycle gets a good workout. Currently I can't consume
enough of them to make them wrap around within the time frame of a test.
IIRC I lobotomized it up by removing the XLogInsert()
On 05/29/2014 09:39 AM, Jeff Janes wrote:
I've applied my partial-write testing harness to several scenarios in
9.4. So far its found a recovery bug for gin indexes, a recovery bug
for btree, a vacuum bug for btree indexes (with foreign keys, but that
is not relevant to the bug), and
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Jeff Janes wrote:
One thing is that I want to find a way to drive multixact in fast forward,
so that the freezing cycle gets a good workout. Currently I can't consume
enough of them to make them wrap around within the time frame of a test.
IIRC
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:09 PM, Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
What features in 9.4 need more beta testing for recovery?
Another feature which have interaction with recovery is reduced WAL
for Update operation:
18 matches
Mail list logo
